In the 1960s, two intrepid researchers took their subjects and injected them with adrenaline. They saw the typical physiological effects, an increased heart rate, an increase in tremors or jitteriness from the participants. All to be expected.
Next, the researchers put their subjects in a waiting room with another person. Unbeknownst to our participants, this other person was in on the experiment. He was an actor told to either act euphoric or increasingly angry. As our actor started bouncing off the wall, playing with paper airplanes or becoming increasingly agitated at the paperwork he was filling out, our scientists were observing the theatrics through a one-way mirror. Hopped up on adrenaline, the subjects started to shift their behavior to be in line with the actor.
The adrenaline shots caused a physiological reaction, but what way their emotions went depended on context.
There was one other group that we haven't discussed: the informed ones. Upon receiving an adrenaline shot, this group was told what they had received and what they were likely to feel. When placed in the room with the angry or joyful actor, their behavior didn't conform. They stayed who they were. They knew that their feelings and sensations of arousal came from the shot.
And if those individuals were made aware that the shots of adrenaline would make them feel slightly excited, anxious, or jittery, well they didn't conform to the silliness or anger around them. They already knew where their sensations and feelings were coming from: a shot.
We often think that we are at the whims to our emotional arousal. We attribute our emotional responses to things outside of our control. You can see in our language: "Why do you make me so angry/sad/happy?... You scared me to death!" But what research has continually shown is that attribution matters. We interpret the sensations and feelings that we experience according to context.
So if we feel the effects of adrenaline on the starting line, we attribute it to the nervousness of racing. If we are on the top of a bridge, we might attribute it to our fear of heights. But as the original adrenaline shot studies demonstrate, that attribution is an exacting science. We can nudge and sway how we interpret the sensations we experience. And simply being aware of that fact, can weaken the connection between sensation and attribution, giving us power over how we want to interpret what we are feeling.
If you like this newsletter and want to learn more and support our work, please share it with your friends and consider buying our book, The Passion Paradox: A Guide to Going All In, Finding Success, and Discovering the Benefits of an Unbalanced Life. You can get a copy from Amazon, Barnes and Noble, or your neighborhood bookstore.
If you want these newsletters delivered to your mailbox every week, along with the five most interesting links we come across, subscribe here!